Wednesday, January 8, 2020

The DTNT communities list preparedby Idate commission in three parts


The list of De-notified, Nomadic and Semi-Nomadic communities has been prepared in three parts as explained overleaf.

1. List 1A/2A/3A- State list of De-notified/Nomadic/Semi-Nomadic Tribes:

This consists of the list of communities which have been either listed by the State Government as DNT/NT/SNT or accepted by the State Government as DNT/NT/SNT as per the Draft list sent to them by the Commission.

2. List 1B/2B/3B- Additional list of De-notified/Nomadic /Semi-Nomadic Tribe

The list includes those communities which have not been listed by the State Government as DNT/NT/SNT but the commission through its own scrutiny found them to be present in the State.

3. List 1C/2C- List of Tribe for inclusion:

The list includes those DNT/NT/SNT communities which have been listed in the previous list prepared by the Renke Commission as well as appear to be found in various secondary sources. This also includes names of those communities regarding which the Commission received specific representation/memoranda but could not field-validate in absence of a field survey. This list, therefore, requires further validation.

Source- Source- Report of  Naional Commission for Denotified, Nomadic and Semi-nomadic Tribes, 2017, p 93-94


Note- Above note is just an extract of the report.



Sunday, January 5, 2020

उ. प्र. सामाजिक न्याय समिति, 2018 तथा ‘अन्य पिछड़ा वर्ग’ का उप-वर्गीकरण

जून 2018 में, उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार ने पिछड़ों के आर्थिक, सामाजिक, शैक्षणिक और नौकरियों में उनकी भागीदारी के अध्ययन के लिए सेवानिवृत्त न्यायाधीश राघवेंद्र कुमार की अध्यक्षता में चार सदस्यीय ‘सामाजिक न्याय समिति’ का गठन किया था।  बनारस हिंदू विश्वविद्यालय के प्रोफेसर भूपेंद्र विक्रम सिंह, रिटायर्ड आई.ए.एस. जे पी विश्वकर्मा और सामाजिक कार्यकर्ता अशोक राजभर समिति के अन्य सदस्य थे।

समिति ने दिसम्बर 2018 में अपनी रिपोर्ट उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार को सौप दी हैं| विभिन्न समाचार पत्रों में इस सम्बन्ध में छपी खबरों के अनुसार समिति ने ‘अन्य पिछड़े वर्ग’ के 27 प्रतिशत आरक्षण को तीन भागों में बांटने की सिफारिश की है। ये तीन भाग पिछड़ा, अति पिछड़ा और सर्वाधिक पिछड़ा के रूप में होंगे। पिछड़ा को 7 प्रतिशत,  अति पिछड़ा को 11 प्रतिशत और सर्वाधिक पिछड़ा वर्ग को 9 प्रतिशत आरक्षण देने की सिफारिश की गई है।

अखबारों में छपी खबरों के अनुसार पिछड़ा में यादव, अहीर, कुर्मीसोनार और चौरसिया आदि जातियां शामिल हैं| अति पिछड़ा वर्ग में गिरी, गुर्जर, गोंसाई, लोध, कुशवाहा, कुम्हार, माली, लोहार आदि तथा सर्वाधिक पिछड़ा में मल्लाह, केवट, निषाद, गद्दी, घोसी, राजभर जैसी जातियां हैं|

सन्दर्भ-


Saturday, January 4, 2020

Idate Commission Report, 2017 on 'definition of NT & DNT and identification/ Listing of communities'


8. Definition of NT & DNT and identification/ Listing of communities:

8.1 There is no clear definition of Nomadic Tribes or Semi-Nomadic Tribes for official purposes by the Government of lndia, as it is for the 'tribe'. Also a reliable list of De-notified and Nomadic Tribes has been lacking. The present Commission has prepared a list of these communities drawing from the l93l Census of lndia, State List of these communities wherever available, earlier reports, e.g., Renke Commission's report, and inferences drawn from the interactions with the State Government officials and other stakeholders during the field visits and after detailed consultation with Anthropologists, Social scientists, Community representatives, etc. This list, however, could not be field validated since the proposed field survey could not be conducted.

8.2 During the process of preparing the list, the Commission encountered difficulties in identifying and classifying communities as NT/DNT since some State Governments did not accept their status as NT/DNT even though these communities were living in these States for years. lt is therefore important that any Nomadic Tribe or Semi-Nomadic Tribe recognized in any state of lndia, or a Union Territory should be recognized uniformly as De-notified Tribe/Nomadic Tribe throughout the Union of lndia, for official purposes by the Government of lndia. There should not be any discrimination in this respect. (This report has all through argued that these communities are the poorest, most excluded and' marginalized, and most stigmatized. Therefore, these communities need our attention, first and foremost.)

8.3 As and when any future Census or enumeration brings to notice any other community or communities having nomadic or semi-nomadic way of life, or were listed as Criminal Tribe in the past, they should be instantly considered for inclusion in the list after a proper scrutiny.

8.4 As they become aware of the Commission, many communities from different parts of the country kept approaching the Commission even towards the end of its tenure and gave memoranda/ representations regarding their inclusion. The Commission submits that besides the communities which have been listed in this report, there may be many left out communities. lt is, therefore, recommended that States should constitute a small committee, consisting of both Government officers and experts in the field of Anthropology and Sociology, to identify the remaining communities. Assistance from the Anthropological Survey of lndia and the Office of the Registrar General of lndia can be sought for this work.

8.5 There is a consistent demand from many communities that they are known by different names in different regions and states and there should be some uniformity in the nomenclature of their communities for their easy identification state wise and nationwide (For example, Sansis are known as Chharas, Dabgars, Salats, Adodiyas in Gujarat and Kanjar and Kanjarbhat in Maharashtra). To address this issue as well as to help better administer Government policies for these communities, the Government of lndia may consider adopting a single standard nomenclature for those communities which have different names (synonyms) in various regions after due consultation with the relevant stakeholders and experts.

8.6 The field visits and interaction with these communities revealed that though majority of population of these communities now possess Aadhar and Voter's lD card, many still do not have any form of identification and they face problems in proving their identities. The remaining DNT/NT population may be given Aadhar and other identity documents on priority.

8.7 Special steps need to be taken to issuing certificates such as caste certificate, domicile certificate, BPL cards and other documents, by relaxing the rules wherever required after due enquiry by a revenue or panchayat authority.

8.8 A single caste certificate, i.e., SC- DNT ST-DNT, OBC -DNT to be issued instead of giving two separate certificates, e .g., one for SC/ST/OBC and another for DNT/NT.

Source- Source- Report of  Naional Commission for Denotified, Nomadic and Semi-nomadic Tribes, 2017, p 116-118


Note- Above note is just an extract of the report.

Renke Commission Report, 2008 on 'definition of De-notified tribes'


The Commission held discussions with experts in the disciplines of anthropology, sociology and other social sciences in this regard and arrived at the definitions and criteria discussed below-

The De-notified Tribes:

These are communities (or ‘tribes’) that, during the British regime, due to specific administrative as well as law and order reasons, were ‘notified’ as being ‘born criminal’ by the British Government under a series of laws starting with the Criminal Tribes Act of 1871. These laws were enacted as crime was considered a ‘hereditary profession’ and the enactment of the law and its entry into the working of police training as well as in the public arena slapped the brand of being ‘born criminals’ on the entire population of these communities. After Independence, this Act was repealed in 1952, and the communities were ‘de-notified’, hence the name. Within the period of notification, while the communities were branded as criminals quite unjustifiably, efforts were also made to settle them as large groups at several places throughout the country. More than 50 such ‘settlements’ were established in the country [in Ayyangar Committee Report (1951: 137-9) information about Bombay and Madras Provinces was not available. The Criminal Tribes Act was already repealed by these two Provinces at the time of Ayyangar Committee] where a large number of people from such communities were re-located, who were confined to a specific locality and used as labourers in road or dam construction and in different industries. Even while these were often termed as ‘open prisons’, land was allotted to the people, housing created, though under strict police supervision, and occupational training was imparted to them in various trades with a view to get them habituated to a settled living earned through hard labour. In addition to the wages paid to the working persons, special allowances were also paid to non-earning persons.

Schools were opened for children. As a result of these efforts, as it is observed today, the living condition of the DNT population in the erstwhile settlements is ironically far better as compared to their counterparts who never got into the settlements, or broke away from them after the settlements were opened.

Thus, the term ‘Denotified Tribes’ stands for all those communities which were notified under the several versions of Criminal Tribes Acts enforced during the British Rule between 1871 and 1947 throughout the Indian territory and were ‘denotified’ by the repeal of these Acts after India’s Independence. A list of such communities was compiled by the Ayyangar Committee. The Commission has adopted this list along with those sent by the States for the purpose of its investigation and inquiry.

Source- Report of  Naional Commission for Denotified, Nomadic and Semi-nomadic Tribes, 2008, p 10-11


Note- Above note is just an extract of the report.

Renke Commission Report, 2008 on 'sources for preparing the list of Nomadic and Semi-nomadic Tribes'

The list can be prepared by collating the following sources:

(1) The Census of India, 1931, which gives a list of nomadic communities, under the rubric of ‘wandering communities’.

(2) The People of India Project, which provides short ethnographic sketches on 4,635 communities. A close reading of the volumes of this project will help us in identifying nomadic communities or communities that had a traditional nomadic background; may be a century ago, they were leading a fullynomadic or semi-nomadic existence.

(3) The list of nomadic and semi-nomadic communities provided by different states and union territories of India.

(4) The list of nomadic and semi-nomadic communities prepared on the basis ofthe field survey undertaken by members of the Commission.

(5) The representations made by different communities claiming to be traditionally nomadic. For examining their claims, the following criteria should be adopted:

(a) Communities that have a traditional social background of nomadism; that is to say, which were nomadic in the past, say a century ago, and their claim is supported with authentic historical evidence, whether supplied by the community itself or by independent researchers; in all cases, the veracity of sources needs to be ascertained before. Such communities had (or may continue to have) a varietyof occupations, such as pastoralism, begging, providing entertainment (sometimes with animals, such as bears, monkeys, snakes, parrots), herbal treatment and fortune telling, artisan work, hawking and vending, semi-skilled or skilled labour,etc,

(b) Marginalization from social and economic mainstream. In global economy, goods and services are standardized and centrally controlled by multinationals and other organizations. The newly emerging global economic system does not allow these communities to lead their traditional life, with the result that nomadic communities have lost their livelihoods and independence. Folk artists of the past have become destitute; artisans who supplied agricultural implements or weapons of warfare are reduced to beggars; pastoralists who once owned large flocks of animals are now landless labourers or marginal farmers.

(c) Low human development index and high relative deprivation index. In other words, in matters of health, livelihood, occupation, and education, their communities are lowly placed. They have long periods of hunger; they remain in debt-bondage for longer period, and are unable to pay off their loans for generations; they perpetually experience the scarcity of resources. This is reflected in their social, economic, cultural, and educational backwardness.

(d) Large deprivation from the gains of planned development. As a consequence of their occupational requirements, they are unable to take advantage of the development programmes; therefore, their life continues as it is.

(e) Lack of empowerment. The nomadic communities have been at the margin of the political system. Since they do not have a permanent residence, they have not been able to obtain an ‘identity card’, or any other proof of their being a citizen of the state. Their names do not exist in the list of voters. As a consequence of this disability, they are debarred from all those ventures that require a proof of theircitizenship. They are denizens of the nation without the rights of citizenship.

(f) Carriers of social stigma. The label of ‘criminal’, ‘beggar’, and ‘untouchable’ is attached to them. The peasant villages consider pastoral nomads as ‘nuisance’.

Source- Report of  Naional Commission for Denotified, Nomadic and Semi-nomadic Tribes, 2008, p 18-19 http://socialjustice.nic.in/writereaddata/UploadFile/NCDNT2008-v1%20(1).pdf


Note- Above note is just an extract of the report.

Technical Advisory Group Reort, 2006 on 'definitions of Denotified Tribes and Nomadic & Semi-nomadic Tribes'


A. Definition of Denotified Tribes

i. Just as there is a Schedule for Tribes and a Schedule for Castes, no specific Schedule for Denotified Tribes – that is, the communities notified under a series of Criminal Tribes Acts during the colonial period—was formed. Some of them have come to be placed as Scheduled Tribes, some as Scheduled Castes, some others as OBCs, and a few of them excluded from all of these.

ii. For the purpose of formulating a clear definition of the Denotified Tribes of India, all communities or segments of communities, that had been placed under the Criminal Tribes Acts, beginning with CTA 1871, in any part of colonial India, till their denotification in the 1950s, are to be considered as Denotified Tribes throughout the Union of India irrespective of their present geographical location.

iii. The most authentic list of Denotified Tribes was presented in the Report of Aiyengar Committee (constituted by R. N. 22/1/49—Police-I, Dt. 28.9.49) prepared for the Union Government (List reproduced on pages 257 to 262). Over and above the communities or tribes listed in the Aiyengar Committee Report, all other tribes or communities, whose denotification preceded the date of appointment of the Aiyengar Committee, are to be considered as Denotified Tribes.

A1. Definition of Nomadic and Semi-nomadic Tribes

i. There has not been any clear definition of Nomadic Tribes, or Seminomadic Tribes in existence used for official purposes of the Government of India.The only reliable list of Nomadic Tribes compiled so far can be sourced from the 1931 Census of India.

ii. All Tribes and Communities included in the 1931 Census as Nomadic or Semi-nomadic are to be treated for the purposes of the Government of India as Nomadic Tribes. Any Nomadic Tribe or Semi-nomadic Tribe recognized in any state of India, or a Union Territory as such, is to be recognized uniformly as Nomadic Tribes throughout the Union of India, for the purpose of the Government of India.

iii. As and when the future Census enumeration brings to notice any other such communities showing livelihood patterns that are nomadic or semi nomadic, the communities in point be considered through a proper scrutiny for inclusion in the category of Nomadic Tribes.

A2. Official Listing and Placement of Denotified, Nomadic and Seminomadic Tribes

i. Any tribe or community falling within the definition of Denotified Tribes, and recognized as a Scheduled Tribe in one or more state/states, is to be recognized as Scheduled Tribe for the purpose of the Government of India.

ii. Any tribe or community falling within the definition of Denotified Tribes, and recognized as a scheduled Caste in one or more state/states, is to be recognized as Scheduled Caste throughout the Republic for the purpose of the Government of India.

iii. Any tribe or community falling within the definition of Denotified Tribes, and is recognized variously as a Scheduled Tribe as well as Schedule Caste in different states, is to be recognized as Scheduled Tribe uniformly throughout the Republic for the purpose of the Government of India.
iv. Any tribe or community that falls within the list of Denotified Tribes as per the definition of Denotified Tribes given in this report, and not included in either the schedule of tribes or the schedule of castes, is to be included either in the schedule of tribes or the schedule of castes by the government of India on the basis of the merit of the case.

v. Any Tribe or Community or Group recognized in any part, State or Union Territory of India as Nomadic or Semi-nomadic, is to be recognized uniformly throughout the Union of India, for the purpose of the Government of India, as Nomadic Tribe.

vi. Any Nomadic or Semi nomadic tribe or community that falls within the definition of Nomadic Tribe as given in this report, and recognized as a Scheduled Tribe in one or more state/states, is to be recognized as Scheduled Tribe for purpose of the Government of India.

vii. Any Nomadic or Semi nomadic tribe or community that falls within the definition of Nomadic Tribes given in this report, and recognized as a scheduled Caste in one or more state/states, is to be recognized as Scheduled Caste throughout the Republic for the purpose of the Government of India.
viii. Any Nomadic or Semi nomadic tribe or community that falls within the definition of Nomadic Tribes given in this report, and recognized variously as a Scheduled Tribe as well as Schedule Caste in different states, is to be recognized as Scheduled Tribe uniformly throughout the Republic for the purpose of the Government of India.

ix. Any Nomadic or Semi nomadic tribe or community that falls within the list of Nomadic tribes as defined in this report, and not included in either the schedule of tribes or the schedule of castes, is to be included either in the schedule of tribes or the schedule of castes by the Government of India on the basis of the merit of the case.

x. A separate Schedule for Denotified, Nomadic and Semi-nomadicTribes ought to have been created immediately after Independence.In absence of such a Scuedule, the Technical Advisory Group strongly recommends that a Comprehensive National List of Denotified, Nomadic and Semi-nomadic Tribes and  (CNL-DNSTC), at par with Schedule of Tribes and Schedule of Castes, may be prepared for the following purposes:

a. For ensuring an equitable delivery of rights, entitlements and social justice;
b. For redressal of the stigma of criminality;
c. For facilitating inter-ministerial coordination in dealing with these Tribes and Communities.

Source-Recommendations of the Technical Advisory Group 2006, P 346-349
https://www.scribd.com/doc/933435/TAG-Report

Note- Above note is just an extract of the report.